Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorPeker, İskender
dc.contributor.authorGök-Kısa, A. Cansu
dc.contributor.authorBüyüközkan, Gülçin
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T10:28:22Z
dc.date.available2023-01-30T10:28:22Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0038012122003068?token=3BA1C75E0882CC1F292779394289812F590210B71551B49DB53387D0D771F30F29C75499CC49DC6031A58CB805F0267F&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20230130081730
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/5614
dc.description.abstractWaste management has come to the fore in the whole world with the increasing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic along with concerns about human health, environmental threats, and socio-economic factors, etc. Medical waste is one of the waste types that need special management processes including particularly collection, storage, separation, and disposal. Healthcare activities create a great amount of medical waste deriving from the hospitals. This study aims to determine the hospital that carries out medical waste management in the most effective way in Erzurum, Turkey. To handle intense uncertainty in the evaluation process, the case is analyzed by Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (IFMCDM) methods. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on a real case problem under IF environment in a Group Decision-Making (GDM) framework. Additionally, based on the literature review and expert judgments, the evaluation criteria relevant to the case are defined in this paper. To this end, a four-phased integrated methodology that involves Intuitionistic Fuzzy Weighted Averaging (IFWA), IF Analytical Hierarchy Process (IFAHP), IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS) and One-Dimensional Sensitivity Analysis, is conducted. Firstly, IFWA is aimed to express the significance levels of decision makers (DMs) based on their knowledge, qualifications and experiences. Secondly, IFAHP is used to calculate the importance weights of the decision criteria and IFTOPSIS is preferred to rank the available hospitals. Then, sensitivity analysis is employed to display robustness. According to the results, the most important criteria are Qualified personnel, Health institution infrastructure, and Control of waste, respectively and the most efficient hospital is determined.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSocio-Economic Planning Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGDMen_US
dc.subjectIFAHPen_US
dc.subjectIFMCDMen_US
dc.subjectIFTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectMedical waste managementen_US
dc.titleMulti-criteria evaluation of medical waste management process under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case study on hospitals in Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6402-5117en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorPeker, İskender
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seps.2022.101499en_US
dc.authorwosidDVK-3153-2022en_US
dc.authorscopusid56471660100en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationidPMID: 36540295


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster