Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAyşegül Kurt Kasap
dc.contributor.authorBurçin Kurt
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-29T12:41:30Z
dc.date.available2025-01-29T12:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2025 Jan 17en_US
dc.identifier.citation1: K Kasap A, Kurt B. Exploring the Correlation of Physiological Stress Signals with Student Exam Performance: A Preliminary Study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s10484-025-09685-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39821509.en_US
dc.identifier.uripubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39821509/#full-view-affiliation-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/6385
dc.description.abstractStress responses in real-world settings are less studied compared to controlled laboratory environments, limiting our understanding of their impact on cognitive performance. This study investigates the relationship between physiological stress signals and academic performance using an open-access dataset of 10 students assessed across three exam sessions (Midterm 1, Midterm 2, and Final Exam). Physiological measures, including electrodermal activity (EDA), heart rate (HR), and skin surface temperature (TEMP), along with exam grades, were analyzed using traditional hypothesis testing, bootstrap method, correlation analysis, and regression tree modeling. To address the small sample size, we validated traditional hypothesis test results with the bootstrap method, and both approaches were compatible. Hypothesis testing revealed no significant differences in physiological measures across exam sessions, supporting the null hypothesis. Grades differed significantly between the final exam and both midterms (p < 0.05). Stress fluctuations were also analyzed across three periods (beginning, middle, and end) for each exam, revealing temporal response variations. Correlation analysis showed a moderate negative relationship between EDA and HR (r = - 0.504, p < 0.01) and a weak positive relationship between EDA and TEMP (r = 0.417, p < 0.05), both intensifying during the final exam. Regression analysis explained 78% of the variance in grades (R2 = 0.78), with regression tree modeling identifying lower skin temperature (< 28 °C) and higher EDA (≥ 0.19) as predictors of poorer performance. These findings underscore the interplay between physiological stress responses and academic outcomes, emphasizing the need for further research and interventions to support student success.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPubMed Disclaimeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAppl Psychophysiol Biofeedback .en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhysiological stress signals; Regression analysis; Statistical analysis; Student exam performance.en_US
dc.titleExploring the Correlation of Physiological Stress Signals with Student Exam Performance: A Preliminary Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.departmentMeslek Yüksekokulları, Gümüşhane Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Terapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8560-5759en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKurt Kasap, Ayşegül
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10484-025-09685-2en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationid39821509en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster