Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTerhan, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorÖzağdaş, Emre
dc.contributor.authorOmar, Muhammed Arslan
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T06:55:18Z
dc.date.available2023-05-12T06:55:18Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationEnergy and economic assessments of waste heat recovery by designs of economizer, condensing economizer and air preheater [Ekonomizer, yoğuşmalı ekonomizer ve hava ön ısıtıcı tasarımları ile atık ısı geri kazanımının enerji ve ekonomik değerlendirilmesi] Terhan, Meryem a Send mail to Terhan M.; Özağdaş, Emre b Send mail to Özağdaş E.; Omar, Muhammed Arslanen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gazimmfd/issue/76742/1112011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/5929
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the waste heat loss of flue gases from the boilers of Kafkas University district heating system has been calculated between 6-8% according to the combustion analysis and the annual cost of this heat loss has been found as $58,658.79. In terms of energy efficiency and the national economy, we think that this lost energy should be recovered as much as possible and fuel and energy savings should be achieved. In the paper, the effects of variants such as air excess coefficient, flue gas temperature, boiler capacity and fuel consumption on the heat recovery from flue gas have been presented in detail. The heat recovery scenarios have been presented for reusing this waste energy for space heating, domestic hot water, and preheating combustion air and the applicability of these scenarios has been investigated in terms of thermodynamics and economics. According to the results of the study, in the second scenario examined to cover the domestic hot water need of the guest house building, the energy savings of the scenario can be provided during 20 years of economic life is $122,820.83, and it has the highest savings income among the scenarios. In addition, it is possible to recover approximately 50% of the flue gas loss with thanks to the scenario. On the other hand, the third scenario of heating the boiler combustion air with waste heat is the easiest and most economical scenario because its payback period is only one year, and there are no extra excavation and pipe costs. © 2023 Gazi Universitesi Muhendislik-Mimarlik. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherGazi Universitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectair preheateren_US
dc.subjectcondensing economizeren_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectheat recovery unitsen_US
dc.titleEnergy and economic assessments of waste heat recovery by designs of economizer, condensing economizer and air preheateren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-7556-9240en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2521en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTerhan, Meryem
dc.identifier.doi10.17341/gazimmfd.1112011en_US
dc.identifier.endpage2536en_US
dc.authorwosidDZI-0329-2022en_US
dc.authorscopusid57170669900en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster