Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T06:11:08Z
dc.date.available2023-01-31T06:11:08Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-17177-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/5637
dc.description.abstractWetlands are critical to the ecology because they maintain biodiversity and provide home for a variety of species. Researching, mapping, and conservation of wetlands is a challenging and time-consuming process. Because they produce temporal and geographical information, remote sensing and photogrammetric approaches are useful tools for analyzing and managing wetlands. In this study, the water areas of five different wetlands obtained with Sentinel-2 images in Turkey were classified. Although obtaining large amounts of high-dimensional dataset labeled for various land types is costly, it is a significant advantage to use it after model training in a wide range of applications. In this paper, the EuroSAT dataset was used in the validation process. Proposed deep learning–based 1D convolutional neural networks (CNN) and traditional machine learning methods (i.e., support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, K-nearest neighborhood, canonical correlation forests, and AdaBoost.M1) were compared quantitatively (i.e., accuracy, recall, precision, specificity, F-score, and image quality assessment metrics) and qualitatively. Finally, pairwise comparison was made with chi-square-based McNemar’s test. There is a statistical difference between 1D CNN and machine learning method (except the support vector machine vs linear discriminant analysis in Test 1 area). CNN models outperform machine learning algorithms in terms of non-linear function approximation and the ability to extract and articulate data features. Since 1D CNNs can process data in a highly complex and unique feature space, they are very successful in segmenting strongly related and highly correlated discrete signals. It also has advantages over machine learning methods for water body extraction in that it can be integrated with sophisticated image pre-processing and standardization tools, is less susceptible to low-level random noise, and provides shift in variations and contrast-invariant image local transforms. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessen_US
dc.subject1D CNNen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_US
dc.subjectWetlanden_US
dc.subjectSentinel-2en_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of deep learning and machine learning methods in determining wetland water areas using EuroSAT dataseten_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000715190000002en_US
dc.departmentEnstitüler, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Harita Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5164-375Xen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue14en_US
dc.identifier.startpage21092en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünen, Mehmet Akif
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-021-17177-zen_US
dc.identifier.endpage21106en_US
dc.authorwosidGXM-4960-2022en_US
dc.authorscopusid57190371587en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationidPMID: 34746985en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster