İlahiyat Fakültesi
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/69
2024-03-29T05:52:30ZComparing the Approach of Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and Badr ad-Din al-Ayni in the Interpretation of Mukhtalaf al-Hadith: An Applied Study Through Fath al-Bari and Umda al-Qari
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/5771
Comparing the Approach of Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and Badr ad-Din al-Ayni in the Interpretation of Mukhtalaf al-Hadith: An Applied Study Through Fath al-Bari and Umda al-Qari
Khan, Alam
This article deals with a brief study of the history of the emergence of mukhtalifu'l-hadith science and its literature, as it is one of the most important types of hadith science that fuqaha`a and muhadithun need it in the deducing of the primary and secondary provisions and the explaining of the Prophetic hadiths. It includes a detailed comparative study between the approach of Hafiz bn. Hajar al-Asqalani al-Shafi`i (d. 852/1449), and Badru'd-Din al-`Ayni al-Hanafi (d. 855/1451) in the interpretation of mukhtalifu'l-hadith through Fathu'l-Bari and `Umdatu'l-Qari. it was clarified that each of them was exposed to the study of seemingly contradictory texts in the folds of the explanation of the hadiths of al-Bukhari and expanded on it and excelled in it. In addition, a glance has been shed in this article on the differences of muhadithun and fuqaha`a among the Hanafis scholars in arranging the ways of pairing in the interpretation of mukhtalifu'l-hadith in general, and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani and Badru'd-Din al-`Ayni in particular. It has been proven from the application of examples from Fathu'l-Bari and `Umdatu'l-Qari that Ibn Hajar does not expand on abrogation if it is possible to combine it, unlike Badru'd-Din al-`Ayni.
2022-01-01T00:00:00ZHUKUKÎ HÜKMÜN BELİRLENMESİ AÇISINDAN VÂV HARFİYLE MATÛF CÜMLELERDEN SONRA GELEN İSTİSNÂNIN MERCİİNİN TESPİTİ – I –
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/2124
HUKUKÎ HÜKMÜN BELİRLENMESİ AÇISINDAN VÂV HARFİYLE MATÛF CÜMLELERDEN SONRA GELEN İSTİSNÂNIN MERCİİNİN TESPİTİ – I –
Gönan, Yavuz; Kaya, Ali
Hukukçunun elindeki en önemli malzeme hukuk normlarıdır. Bunlar da ait oldukları dilde ve o dilin kuralları doğrultusunda yazılmaktadır. İslam hukukunun kaynağı olan Kur’ân ve Sünnet nasları da Arapça olduğu için fakih, hukukî nasları yorumlarken Arapça dilbilgisi (nahiv) kurallarını dikkate almalıdır. Buna göre fakih; Arapça cümle yapısı şekillerinden biri olan istisnâ üslubunun kurallarını bilmeli ve hüküm istidlâlinde bu kuralları uygulamalıdır. İstisnâyla ilgili usûl-ı fıkıhtaki temel tartışma alanlarından biri de vâv ile matûf cümlelerden sonra gelen istisnânın merciinin tespitidir. Matûf cümlelerden sonra kullanılan istisnânın merciinin, yani müstesnâ minh’in, dilbilgisi kuralları doğrultusunda tespit edilmesi; istisnânın, hukukî hükmün teşekkülüne etkisinin belirlenmesi ve kurallarının uygulanması bakımından önem taşımaktadır. Bu nedenle çalışmamızda önce genel olarak usulcülerin konuyla ilgili teorik yaklaşımları, gerekçeleri ve çözümleri açıklanmış; ardından en-Nûr sûresinin 4-5. âyetleri bağlamında, görüşlerini uygulamalı olarak temellendirme çabaları ele alınmıştır; The most important materials in the hands of the jurist are legal norms. Every norm that notifies judgment has written in its own language according to that language’s rules. The jurist of Islam should take into consideration the rules of the Arabic language’s grammar (nahw) while he is interpreting the judicial verdicts because the judicial verdicts of the Qur’an and the Sunnah which are the founder texts of Islamic law are the Arabic language. In accordance with that the jurist should know the rules of grammar of the exception wording that is one of the shape of structure of Arabic sentence and implement these rules in deduction of judgment. The one of the basic discussion field of usul al-fiqh about the exception wording is the determination of the exception’s status which comes after sentences directed towards waw. The determination of exception’s status which is used after directed sentences, in other words mustasna minh, according to the rules of grammar is of capital importance from the point of view of designation of the impression of exception to judicial verdict’s formation and judicial implemetation. Because of that reason, in our study firstly theoretical approaches, justifications and solutions of the precodurers have been explained; in the wake of that their efforts to establish firmly and practically their opinions in the context of the verse 4 and 5 of the Sûrat al-Nûr have been discussed.
2021-01-01T00:00:00ZTHE IMPACT OF ORIENTALISTS ON GHAMIDI’S THEORIES
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/2020
THE IMPACT OF ORIENTALISTS ON GHAMIDI’S THEORIES
Khan, Alam
Javed Ahmad Ghamidi is a prominent scholar of Farahi- Islahi School of thought. Due to his unorthodox approach to Islam, his works welcomed in the contemporary literate class of Indo-Pak subcontinent. The superficial study of Javed Ahmad Ghamidi reveals that he quenched his theories from the classical Islamic Sources and did not refer to the Modern European Scholarship. However, the profound comparative study of Ghamidi’s piece of work shows that he studied fundamental theories like “the variant of readings, the sources of the religion, the division of Prophetic hadiths, and reproval on the essential narrators of hadith” on the methodology of Orientalists. This study contains some instances from Javed Ahmad Ghamidi’s theories and on their roots that prove who introduced these theories and how Ghamidi developed them
2020-01-15T00:00:00ZKelime-İ Tevhîdi Yaşamak - İbn Receb el-Hanbelî
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12440/2001
Kelime-İ Tevhîdi Yaşamak - İbn Receb el-Hanbelî
Yılmaz, Fetullah
[Abstract Not Available]
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z